Wednesday, 27 November 2013
From the results i can gather that Action, Crime & Gangster are popular genres, i feel that when it is time for me to create my sequence, One of these 3 genres are most likely as it will create a sequence which meets the demands of the audience
Monday, 25 November 2013
It is clear to see straight away that the scene is dark & grey, this brings a eery element to the title sequence. Now we already know that conventions of a horror film are dark ominous scenes, so straight away without the audience knowing what the genre is, they would be able to identify immediately what kind of genre the film is.
I chose a film opening that includes the major horror conventions, the sequence is predominantly silent yet the high pitched stringed instruments helps build tension for the viewers
Monday, 18 November 2013
So we understand some variations in title sequences, but what is the actual definition of a title sequence?
'A title sequence is the method by which films or television programs present their title, key production and cast members, or both, utilizing conceptual visuals and sound. It usually follows but should not be confused with the opening credits, which are generally nothing more than a series of superimposed text' - Art of the Title
Sunday, 10 November 2013
I don’t particularly like this opening title sequence but it has certain elements to it that I found quite interesting. This sequence starts off slow with the sound picking up towards the end when the title of the film is introduced. Every 5 to 7 seconds, there is a black-out where an actor or film crew member is introduced. It’s set in time to the music in the background and the scratchy sound effects that give the sequence an eerie feel to it. It’s slow to draw the audience in and speeds up gradually to keep them engaged. The flicking between the images of the book and the writing to a black screen is quick and not very clear. I feel this is done purposely to mess with the way the audience is thinking. It sets the film up for something psychological or horrific in genre. I like the inventive use of the font in this title sequence because it looks like someone has drawn on the screen. It makes the audience feel as though they are participating rather than observing. The constant close-ups of the images and the book is also effective in keeping the attention of the audience because they are so close to what’s being shown that they can’t be separated from it. I would like to interpret this aspect of the title sequence into my own. There is an effect that’s been edited into this title sequence which is the overlapping of the film footage. It’s almost like the pages of the book being overlapped. The colour and lighting in this sequence is a sickly yellow to associate with ageing and perhaps death which is very effective for setting the mood of the film. We get a sense of psychotic behaviour through the crossing out of words and the extreme close-up of the pen and fingers. It’s like the title sequence is drawing us in so close to the action that we can’t look away. It’s a powerful piece that I learnt to respect rather than like.
Cinematography – Even though there aren't physical camera shots in this sequence, there is a lot of movement that tracks the protagonist. The movement helps represent the main characters determination to not get caught. When the character changes his costume to the pilot, we see this through a close-up, which helps us pay more attention to this transformation. There is a tracking shot when the protagonist is a doctor and when he is when moving up in the lift. This represents that he is 'moving up' and is becoming smarter. However the detective man is already at the top of the building, which also shows how he is more powerful. Editing – Wipes from one scene to another help the keep the transition smooth. For example the wipe from the airport to the car chase is an airplane flying out of the airport and then flying over the road. The sudden changes in location shows how the film is constantly going to be moving along fast, and how it won’t just be set in one place. Another wipe transition is from the police car chasing the taxi to the swimming pool scene. This is because the taxi wipes across the screen acting as a transition between the shots.
‘Skyfall‘ is a seductive, sleazy ballad about nothing in particular. And yet, it sounds exactly like a Bond song should, which is basically music to have sex to… and then die. Still, within its lyrical complexities there are hidden themes to pick up on. Skyfall is where we start 'A thousand miles and poles apart When worlds collide, and days are dark’ Bond wouldn’t be Bond without exotic locations. Hence, when he’s bedded some poor woman in Japan he’s quickly off to Ecuador to shoot someone in the back of the head. When will you ladies learn, the man is not into long distance relationships? 'This is the end’ Cleverly, this isn’t the end of the song, but the beginning. Of course, The Doors song ‘The End’ opens with the same lyrics, before leading the listener into a trance. Will the same happen here? No.
Wednesday, 6 November 2013
Resident Evil's Afterlife opening is in someways similar to Goldfinger, but at the same time has many fundamental differences. For a start the concept of the whole opening for Resident Evil is quite simple, simplified down it is a Japanese lady who turns bad, kills a man and then camera pans out to show the spread of the virus. The fundamental difference being the advances in editing and camera software, Resident Evil's opening is executed exceedingly well, similarly to Goldfinger; using basic camera shots and editing work but to a much higher quality. It is clear to see the intent of director, to show the emotion upon the faces of the woman and man; which i am sure would have been evident in the Goldfinger opening if not for the 45 year gap in technology.
What Goldfinger lack in complexity, certainly doesn't lack in originality. Goldfinger is my personal favourite opening sequence in the 20th century, along side the original Italian Job. Movie studios back then didn't have the advanced technology that movie studios have today, improvisation was needed to catch the eye and draw in the audience without the elaborate effects we take for granted today. The best way in which movies of the period did this was via music, it was hints of what the movie held in store for the audience in very clever musical enigma's, which Goldfinger plays on very well. Compared to the editing techniques used today, Goldfinger's opening is basic, at best; and as a result of this for the next post i will be showing the technological advancements in film openings.